Interpreting user’s message
The user's phrase “真正较量在细节” means “The real contest is in the details." They didn’t specify a task, so they might want me to elaborate or react. As a coding assistant, I should respond concisely and mirror their style in Chinese. I could suggest how I can help with specifics like code reviews, optimizations, or UX improvements. It’d be good to ask what project they’re referring to for clarity while keeping the response concise.Providing options for details
I realize I shouldn't run any shell commands, as there’s no explicit request from the user. My response could start with an agreement in Chinese, acknowledging their point. Then, I should provide options that cover areas where I can help, like code reviews, testing, performance, engineering quality, observability, development experience, and security/compliance. I'll ask the user to pick a number or share the repository path for clarity. This structured approach follows the Codex CLI guidelines well!
确实，胜负常在细节。要不要我从这些方面细抠一遍，给你一份可执行清单？
- 代码审查：边界条件/空值/并发竞态/资源泄漏/异常路径
- 测试补强：极端输入/属性测试/基准测试/快照稳定性/覆盖率空洞
- 性能与内存：剖析热点、N+1/重复 IO、缓存策略、数据结构选择
- 工程质量：lint/format、pre-commit、CI 阶段化校验、静态分析规则
- 可观测性：日志分级与字段、指标与阈值、追踪链路、错误分级与重试
- 安全与依赖：依赖漏洞与许可、Secrets 扫描、SBOM、供应链锁定
- DX 与文档：启动脚本/Makefile、.env 模板、README 任务说明
告诉我项目路径或具体模块，我就按上面清单逐项过一遍；也可以选个编号先做一块。